|
As a matter of fact ...
Are you among the folks who've mistaken FUGLY for an encyclopedia, and expect to find detailed factual information? Or have you watched too many episodes of Seinfeld and Friends to be able to recognize a subtle joke? Or are you an anal-retentive dweeb who just can't keep your fingers away from the lint on other people's clothing? If so, there's a place for you on FUGLY - right here:
|
ville@2kmedia.se writes:
"The bass player for a band you'll never hear" is not a rocker ...
Well duh ...
... he's obviously into industrial music, judging by his Haujobb t-shirt. Haujobb is a 100% electronic band
First of all ... Haujobb ??? Do I even need to elaborate?
Of course, that fits a lot better than we'd expected. I mean, bass players are generally no-talent losers - but folks who abandon instruments altogether are on an entirely different plane. Enough circuitry to launch a spacecraft and the best they can do with it is make "music" that sounds like a recording of a machine shop played on a vacuum-tube AM radio. I've got more respect for the folks who churn out those barking-dog renditions of Christmas tunes.
|
megapol2@hotmail.com writes:
In your article about big hank you mention that the banner is capable of being removed on the year 2000 which you later quote as the millennium ... the milennium is 2001 ... [the] Gregorian calender may be off as much as 6 years.
So what you're saying, then, is it's really only 1993, or is it already 2005? I just adore those junk-science sound-bytes that suggest the things I know are wrong, but shed absolutely no light on what's right.
Anyway, the entire year thing is grounded in mythology anyway, and I've never been quite sure if "AD" counts the days since the big J's birth, his death, or his resurrection.
The entire "leap year" thing is a perfect example of the problem. Big J is nailed to a cross on Wednesday, taken down on Friday and stuck in a hole. On Sunday, he comes out, and if he sees his shadow, there's an extra day of winter.
Honestly.
|
admin@datavibe.net writes:
removing the mailto: part of the email link wont stop spambots, as they dont search for the mailto: part anyways, but most look for the @ symbol and/or a valid top-level (.com/.net/.org/etc) domain.
One more reason not to mistake a corporate lap dogs who've taken a few courses at a community college for an expert: where's the '@' in @?
It might occur to you to "view source" - but then, that would mean having to think.
And it's not like we want to advocate anyone actually thinking before they start firing off their little e-mails. If that happened, the "response" pages would be distressingly blank.
|
everettm@hotmail.com writes:
[Socialized medicine] sure has it's problems, but the benefits have thusfar outweighed them a hundred-fold.
Like we said, fewer Canadians - plus fewer Norweigans, fewer Germans, fewer Brits.
Is it any coincidence that the countries atop the UN's Standard of Living list all have Medicare that is funded by the state?
They've got Medicare in the U.S., too, but only for the unemployed. Though it took a while to reap the benefits, the unemployed population is currently down to under five percent in most areas, which has been wonderful for our own standard of living, and using a social program to deny people adequate medical treatment is much more discreet than simply taking them out in a field and shooting them.
|
madmather@hotmail.com writes:
women can't get prostate cancer. they don't have prostates.
I guess that was too subtle for you - perhaps we should have said "testicular" cancer?
yes, even russian women.
How many have you checked?
|
Fabian.Wolf@dachau.baynet.de writes:
Ya didn't have any German round you when you translated this, right?
I'm not entirely certain what you mean by "this", but probably not. Joe claims to have some German in him, but I think he's referring to Bratwurst. That, or there are aspects of his personal life he hasn't got around to sharing with the rest of us.
Anyway, the only entries with a German "flavor" are When ayran genes attack and They Saved Hitler's Wig, so it's kinda hard to pinpoint what you mean.
or did you use Bablefish?
Maybe you're talking about the letters from omo? They almost read like a Babelfish translation - but that's how they came. Perhaps he used AltaVista's translator (which, for those of you who don't know, translates text from any of several languages into gibberish in any of several others), though I doubt the folks at AV are creative in quite that way.
|
vrown@aol.com writes:
You have no clue wha u r talking about! Goth's are about showing individuality. Goth's are cool squared!
Silly me. I mistook it for a teenage affectation born of desperation for acceptance and attention. How uncool squared I am not to realize a plastic cape and black lipstick are the defining characteristics of a superior mind.
Goth's set themselves aside from normal peolpe for a reason. We realize that we are more special then they are.
I think "special" is a very good word for it.
|
velvety@mindspring.com writes:
Whomever wrote this piece is wrong ... that guy you featured is NOT goth.
Is this one of those position statements like AOL subscribers post in USENET - attempting to define who are the "true" Goth and who are the "false" Goth, written by people we haven't laughed at yet to distance themselves from those we have? You'll have to pardon my utter lack of interest, but it's strongly reminiscient of the true/false "metal" arguments that I cared so little about in the eighties - and it's probably the same crowd anyway.
I am NOT some sort of depressed loser.
That sounds like something a depressed loser would say.
There you go to mixing up the Goths and Mansonites again.
I don't have separate receptacles for urine and feces, either - it's convenient to flush them both at once. Same goes for the various flavors and consistencies of bipedal waste products.
|
pcaddict@uswest.net writes:
I fell for it. I hit a line intended for shock value and I was, frankly, shocked.
Well, at least you're aware of it.
|
|